> Again, person dependent but missing the point. Would have it been more accurate to say they have 1.4327 engineers on the project?

You're reading too far, this is not the point of my comment?

As you mentioned on the part below I was highlighting that they didn't want to put dedicated resource on the projects. The rest is just your own imagination ramping up to assume that I meant something else.

And yes, we didn't know before that was one engineer doing also PM work. But so said, would've been more effective to have an engineer doing the work and a PM on two projects. Is easier to switch between managing stuff than engineering stuff.