You have no proof that it was exceptional. All you have is one case. You have no idea what other people in pay disputes end up doing.
You have no proof that it was exceptional. All you have is one case. You have no idea what other people in pay disputes end up doing.
> You have no idea what other people in pay disputes end up doing.
But also this is a super weak argument. I don’t have “no idea”—I have an educated guess that most people don’t have family friends who work at Google. Most people don’t have the resources to sue an employer over a few hours of unpaid labor. Wage theft is one of the most extensive unprosecuted crimes, that’s been studied and shown many times.
Are you suggesting that one should assume that most low-level employees in pay disputes get happy outcomes? That seems…naive.
Metaphorically.
I mean, while we're being pedantic we may as well get it right.
Or to go with synonyms. Solicits the question. Entreats the question. These are the literal meanings of the words, and they work fine.