If a small group of like-minded people decide to not have kids in the name of the planet, the effect would probably pale in comparison to the masses that don't hear and/or don't care about these climate change messages. I imagine the "real" solution would have to be one that doesn't require people to willingly change their way of life.
By that logic anything you do is useless. But personally not having own kid is the single most effective thing anyone can do. People can just adopt instead.
Adopting a child is totally different than having your own kid(s) and I’m guessing based on your comments that you don’t have a child.
2021: 8 billion
2050: 10 billion
Resources are finite. The world is not only ours, what about the animals and plants? Are we giving them enough space to thrive? Killing them will kill us, and our children too.
What PR and lies have you fallen for, to say individual actions don't matter? Actions have consequences. Each action is a vote. One vote doesn't matter, a lot of votes do. What are you voting for?
Giving love and safety to children who need it now is a noble act. Totally different? Maybe. But love is love. All humans come from the same source. No need to discriminate, let's spread love to all.
Dow Jones in 2022: 34,000
Maybe the Dow Jones is causing climate change!
Countries participating in the Olympics in 1896: 27
Countries participating in the Olympic in 2021: 197
No wait, the Olympics are what’s causing climate change!
> totally different than having your own kid
Why? Why does one need one's genes to care for a child and to be a parent. Your comment is just complete character attack "stupid". If it's so big issue, than may be don't kid yourself about doing anything that will reduce actual climate crisis.