He's got Verizon GPRS broad(ish)band now. Pushing for broadband penetration is missing the point; it might have made sense fifteen years ago, but now, wireless has leapfrogged it - just as it did for voice throughout the Third World, and for the same reasons.
If you're not from a rural area, I think it's difficult to comprehend just how many miles there are out there, and how few paying customers to foot the bill.
A more realistic goal for rural communications would be to have Congress re-subsidize daily postal delivery, to be honest.
I hale from rural Ontario and while our density is greater, we are still a long way away from urban centres. Here, they are working on rolling out fibre right to the farms. High speed DSL has been available for over a decade.
It really is difficult to comprehend that people are still using dialup.
We live inside Ottawa's city limits (the capital for non-Canadians!) so could scarely be considered the middle of nowhere and yet don't have a hardwired broadband connection option.
In Ontario we had DSL access on the farms before the government programs were created, so there is room for a business to make it work. What is different in my area is that the customers own the telephone company, so that provides a good motivator to provide the services that customers want, even if it means lower profits at the end of the year.
I've never heard of broadband over powerline. I'll bet there'd be some interest.
Dad just got fiber connection in the middle of nowhere. (Thanks gov't).
But then he dropped it later and used his 3g connectiong on his cellphone. That tower is 4 miles away and he gets decent reception. At least it's good enough for him.
Very frustrating going home. They had great internet for awhile now. However, with the introduction of bandwidth limited plans, he may be back on the fiber connection soon.