Not the OP but I would say it's "objective" from telegrams perspective.
They shared their decision making process which I agreed with, not too sure what would have been a better choice in that situation.
They shared their decision making process which I agreed with, not too sure what would have been a better choice in that situation.
that's another way to say subjective if you aren't willing to admit it. the whole point of objective/subjective is that its supposed to be POV neutral.
What if the request came from the EU or the US, to ban an account that was campaigning in local elections in violation of local election finance laws?
Note that the ban is not even permanent! It's only for the last 2 days of the 3-day voting window. Campaigning was supposed to have been illegal throughout the whole 3-day period.
It doesn't make the content false just colored by the authors point of view.