But now Google is in charge of deciding which is which. Tech barons deciding what the truth is can't be good for democracy either.
What's bad for democracy is when elections are not auditable. That's why in many countries people do it the old fashion way, with paper balots, ID, and in person, with citizens watching the counting process. Anything else is just prone to be manipulated sooner or later.
What if the election was indeed stolen? You must accept the results? Do you just accept the results no matter what? It seems like you have to do that because it's bad for democracy otherwise right?
Lets say you accept the results, but what do you do in the face of probably a stolen election?
Isn't it over 50% of US states changed/updated their election rules since this last election? I guess actions speak louder than words. I don't know if I have seen so many states agree they needed to fix something so universally and so quickly. Politicians rarely work so quickly.