This article with sweeping generalizations about very complex issues has been written by someone that thinks that "behemoths" is written as "bemouths" and has not been proofread as far as the third line.
https://twitter.com/Cokedupoptions/status/143980011582110105...
It does suggest that what you’re reading hasn’t been proofed. That increases the chances of other, more significant errors, e.g. ones in fact checking, logic or thoroughness.
I think OP's point is that rather than some authoritative oracle, this guy is just a guy.
He makes interesting points, but take them all with a grain of salt.
As such, I dismiss their dismissals as the ravings of a fool.
"Some more words to make this seem more profound a thought than it is."