Hacker News Reader

Comment by FiberBundle | Hacker News Reader

It's not that I believe SpaceX isn't a great company, it's just that I think their potential markets lack the size to justify such a valuation.

View on HN

They're on track with their Mars mission program, and the side effect of the vehicles they're building - and predicted drop in kilogram-to-orbit price tag - will be opening up the whole cislunar space for industrialization. Think in-orbit mining, resource processing and manufacturing. Optimistically, the potential market will explode in size, and ultimately (say, in a century) will be greater than the whole economy of Earth today. So, if you're bullish on space exploration and exploitation, then SpaceX's market has no limit in sight.

You are discounting the potential military contracts that SpaceX will be awarded.

How large is that market? And how much is it expected to grow?

Defense spending as a whole is north of $700 billion a year. But the Space launch market is obviously much smaller, but it is expected to increase at a pretty fast pace.

> The Global Space Launch Services Market size was estimated at USD 12.86 Billion in 2020 and expected to reach USD 14.92 Billion in 2021, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) 16.29% from 2020 to 2026 to reach USD 31.84 Billion by 2026.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/space-launch-services-market...

Including basically everything invested in space, not just launch, the pie is about $330B/yr now according to this:

https://www.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/cislunar-space-next...

Who knows what growth would be like with much cheaper launch but I'm hoping high.

Something that isn't well covered is the rocket motor supply chain. Prior to SpaceX there hadn't been a US manufacturer for heavy lift booster engines since the 90s. Undoubtedly SpaceX is the recipient of DoD funds to build that supply chain and research pipeline for both missile and lifting purposes.

Thomas Watson thought there was a market for maybe five computers in the whole world. Now computing devices outnumber humans. There's no guarantee that there will be a similar explosion in the size of the orbital (and eventually deep space) markets but it's not a large leap to believe that lower cost of access to space will open up many new opportunities that we haven't even imagined yet.

As part of this, there is no inherent reason to believe that 5-20k rocket rides/interplanetary transit wouldn't rapidly become a major lifestyle/luxury item similar to jetset lifestyles of the 50s/60s.

There are a large number of interesting economic opportunities from resource extraction to supersized science experiments and energy production once we're out of the gravity well at reasonable economics.

The military contracts that a company whose CEO has huge ties to China is expected to get?

I realize the US security and military apparatus has gladly been turning a blind eye to Musk's ties with the CCP, but at some point reality imposes itself on you. You can only ignore it for so long, much to the chagrin of the Trump and Biden administrations.

Boeing has huge civilian aircraft sales to China, that's also leverage. The focus on SpaceX and only SpaceX gives you a clue as to where this "issue" came from.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com