Is it a bit tone deaf in the current market? Quite possibly. Is it DOA? Seems to be. Is it offensive or discriminatory? I just don't see how.
Is it a bit tone deaf in the current market? Quite possibly. Is it DOA? Seems to be. Is it offensive or discriminatory? I just don't see how.
The introduction of mandatory middle men into a system listed on the FTC webpage as a classic scam signal (pay for job opportunity) does not fundamentally eliminate the problems with it. The structural incentives are such that this model cannot work except as a scam ripping off most of the people pay into it, and the structural incentives also guarantee that it will mostly be the actual job seekers ultimately paying, even if the payments are forced to be laundered through “referrers”.
My favorite way to think about it comes from an old dating forum: Okay so you want to date a super model … how many super models are you meeting every day? If you aren’t where the super models are, you aren’t going to date a supermodel.
Same with networking. Go where the people you want to meet are. Then meet them.
Want a big network in tech? Go be an intern (or whatever you can get) at a large tech company. Have lunch with a new person every day. Or every few days. Spelunk from there
Want a big network of complainers? Go hang out on twitter. There’s lots of us and we love to complain about everything.
Once upon a time on this very forum I posted a blog: “Hey I’m coming to the Bay Area for 2 months, it’s my first time in USA. Who wants to hang?” that got me a string of coffee dates with dozens of people and it was amazing. I failed to keep in touch but most of us still recognize each other online.