typical reply of a guy who live in SF

> Predictions about what conditions look like in the year 2100 (let alone 2500!) are meaningless because they assume little to no improvement in technology or energy availability.

As meaningless as assuming there will be improvement in technology or energy availability

It's not profitable, therefore it is not the priority, at all

We have the tech to build super cheap housing for everyone, yet poverty and homelessness skyrocket

So to think we'll solve the issue we have with Earth's climate cycling through its natural cycles is mind blogging