May I ask why you do this? Do you not think that others would want to discuss/debate/argue about the topic?
> borderline conspiracy theories floating around here
Do you have an example of one of these? (Genuinely interested in what you mean by this)
Because unoriginal political flamebait is off-topic for this site. From the site guidelines:
> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon.
Certainly this story is neither interesting nor new. It's just Sticks and Stones redux.
Given the quality of discussion associated with these topics they actively diminish my experience of HN and make me want to avoid the site.
> Do you have an example of one of these? (Genuinely interested in what you mean by this)
A very common sentiment I see around here and elsewhere is imagining some secret, organized sjw cabal that's out to get people:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28883427
"The context is there is a playground game being played at scale. In order to be accepted in certain circles, one needs to discern who the thought leaders are, display the proper deference to them, and above all adhere to approved talking points. "
I could probably find half a dozen comments in this thread alone expressing similar sentiments.
> Because unoriginal political flamebait is off-topic for this site. From the site guidelines:
Whilst I agree with you here, when the topic occurs within a tech company I think it is relevant. Basically it's very difficult to separate the tech from the politics in the current climate.
> A very common sentiment I see around here and elsewhere is imagining some secret, organized sjw cabal
When employees and students are being asked to complete "check your thinking" training, it's hard not to think there's a organised cabal pulling all the strings :)