https://covexit.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/slides_Dr_Ros...
While its banner ("independent global news and policy analysis regarding COVID-19, with emphasis on early treatments") seems reasonable, a quick look at the top-15 articles suggests a strong bias away from vaccines, and towards publicising 'alternative' therapies. These are a few of the top articles' titles:
* Professor Didier Raoult Releases the Results of a New Hydroxychloroquine Treatment Study on 1061 Patients
* “We Know it’s Curable; It’s Easier than Treating the Flu” — Professor Thomas Borody
* Australian GPs Can Legally Prescribe Ivermectin Triple Therapy Protocol — Professor Thomas Borody
* Expert Sounds the Alarm about Risks of Mass Vaccination
* The 8th Day Therapy for COVID-19
Further, a quick read of the slides you linked to strongly suggests the author has an agenda. This isn't to say that she's wrong, or that the statistic you quoted is wrong... but it's necessary to call out and understand such obvious biases when decision how to intelligently interpret a piece of work.
Cherry-picking which piece of propaganda or disinformation to paste from a propaganda and disinformation-pushing group doesn't make the propaganda/disinformation less biased