For breaking their ToS literally hundreds of times? If anything it showed incredible bias they kept him on the platform just because of his job ( and the fear of retaliation). If he were a random person, he would have been banned much earlier.
A human decision to ban an individual has no relation to the biases of an algorithm.
Sure it does. If someone burns down a whole forest, it doesn't really matter if someone else cuts down a single tree.
? The specific claim made by the headline is about algorithmic bias. I do not recall an algorithmic banning of Donald Trump.