But are there examples that are more salient to your average civilian with non-controversial politics that lives in a developed democratic nation?
Why should the average be relevant. Phrased this way, it seemed that the object of concern are the grayest.
> with non-controversial [positions]
Are those who decide what takes the label of "controversial" reliable?
> Are those who decide what takes the label of "controversial" reliable?
No -- but the average person who finds themselves squarely within the Overton window will not find that concerning.