Hacker News Reader

These biased sites will declare Intel the winner despite the higher cost in motherboard, CPU, power usage, cost to overclock, and heat creation. These tech sites are obviously nothing but product shilling sites with a cheap veneer that relies on their old reputation, but after seeing them all saying the opposite of reality with Ryzen, I won't give them clicks and I won't buy Intel again.

View on HN

On pure performance metrics Intel will be the winner every cycle they bring one "enthusiast" CPU that tops the benchmark in gaming or creator CPU loads. they are expensive they are power hogs but they are the fastest. I don't get why you are so adjetated by it.

>they are expensive they are power hogs but they are the fastest.

That is absolutely false and a lie for multicore processes, real world usage, and programs that I use. This is an enormous lie, unless your workload only consists of synthetic benchmarks that are Intel optimized and ignore the gains from other hardware like premium DDR5 they use to set these sythetic benchmarks.

As I said in my other comments you are delusional. have a good one. You see a conspiracy theory without proofing it and you disregard the facts from several high regarded sources like anandtech, phoronix and everyone who has published their benchmarks today. It's the literal definition of a delusion.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com