Hacker News Reader

If it's inevitable, why the mandates? Everyone will get it anyway which means the vaccine only helps protect yourself, not others.

If it's not about protecting others, then how can you justify forced medical procedures?

View on HN

People with reduced immune function benefit from reduced disease prevalence, it's pretty straightforward.

For example it's not great that some older folks will inevitably die of COVID over the next 20 years, but it's better than just letting happen over the next 12 months.

Those people are already getting their second or third boosters. What makes you think it would take 20 years for them to get it instead of inside of a year? Covid is highly infectious and spreads easily in spite of mass vaccinations. Getting vaccinated and boosted up is all you can do and even then if you're in a high risk demographic you can still die.

Since the vaccines have been shown to reduce severity of the disease, they will result is less load on medical services. I believe that is the only legitimate reason for mandates.

But if load on medical services is an issue, why are states firing health care workers by the thousands?

I bought the "flatten the curve for 2 weeks" argument a year ago, not so much anymore.

Doesn't seem like a competent approach, does it?

It sure doesn't :/

Reply on news.ycombinator.com