https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Edit: you've been posting flamebait comments repeatedly and we've already asked you once to stop. We ban accounts that do that. I don't want to ban you, so would you please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and fix this? We're trying for something different from internet default here, and as you know, going against entropy takes a lot of energy.
Imo the sooner we outlaw both the sooner we can move on as a species, but maybe that's just me.
Yes, clitoridectomy would correspond to removal of the glans.
In practice, most FGM in the West happens under Islam and is symbolic: A small cut to draw blood, but no amputation. Still unacceptable, but actually less damaging than MGM.
Finally, do not be fooled by "just skin". First of all, it's a lot of skin. There are videos on the internet of African tribes performing circumcisions of adolescents. Watch one.
Second, it's full of nerve endings. The skin is a sense organ. You are removing as much as possible of that which makes sex feel good. To emphasize, this is not like the relatively insensitive skin of the shaft. That's the whole point.
If you're a man, if you pay attention you can get a hint of what you're missing. What's left of the inner foreskin after a circumcision is called a "corona" (as though it's a natural body part). Touch that. You will find that it is one of the most sensitive parts of your penis, arguably even more so than the glans. And if you are a (straight) woman, then I have just given you some important information about how you can still give your partner some (limited) sexual pleasure.
The reality is that so much as a pin-prick or tiny cut (to draw a drop of blood or leave a small mark) is counted[1] and prosecuted[2] as FGM. If the word mutilation fits there, it certainly fits male circumcision.
[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-37819753
[2] https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/09/16/female-...