Not really. The original document contained an outright lie which have now removed because it was exposed.
If you didn’t accept it was a lie, you wouldn’t have removed it.
This has nothing to do with imperfect accuracy. It has to do with you writing an outright falsehood.
The idea that a lie stops being a lie because of the number of words you say later is obviously absurd.
As I have pointed out this is a motte and Bailey fallacy.
Also, it’s still a completely misleading statement. The change to ‘similar to’ doesn’t make it true. It still isn’t true, only now you have some wiggle room to claim it’s not a lie.
You are still trying to misleading people into thinking that NFTs confer ownership of the media.