Parliaments, heads of state, etc have referred to this as "genocide" despite insufficient evidence (the view of US state department lawyers). I don't know what further condemnation you're looking for there.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/29/leaked-papers-...
(edit: *genocide is a significant label, whether China's mistreatment qualifies as that is probably to be determined, but evidence of mistreatment exists)
That's what both my post and the US state department lawyers said. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/19/china-uighurs-genocide-...
To your link, evidence, Adrian Zenz, etc, are things I would prefer not to discuss on this site. :)