I'm slightly puzzled it doesn't get mentioned here. Has this knowledge been lost? I've not been observing construction work first hand for a while but I don't recall the last time i saw a sheep's foot roller in use.
I'm slightly puzzled it doesn't get mentioned here. Has this knowledge been lost? I've not been observing construction work first hand for a while but I don't recall the last time i saw a sheep's foot roller in use.
Clearly not. He talked about soil compaction in earlier articles:
In "Why SpaceX Cares About Dirt"[1] he talks about soil compaction through surcharge loading.
In "What Really Happened At Edenville and Sanford Dams?"[2] he talks about how the lack of proper soil compaction was one reason behind the dam failures.
In "Why Does Road Construction Take So Long?" he identifies soil compaction as one of the most time consuming parts of road construction.
If anything he didn't talk about soil compaction in this article to avoid repeating himself. :)
1: https://practical.engineering/blog/2021/10/28/why-spacex-car...
2: https://practical.engineering/blog/2021/10/14/what-really-ha...
3: https://practical.engineering/blog/2020/6/1/why-does-road-co...
It seems several people are complaining that a transcript of a ~10 minute video isn't an entire engineering education in all possible details of how to create retaining walls. I think that's asking for an awful lot. But at the very least let's credit the things already discussed elsewhere.
The top 2 videos from the following Youtube search results about "retaining walls" do not mention Proctor Tests.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=retaining+wall+...
And halfway down those search results is a retaining wall video presented by geotechnical engineer Andrew Lees that's longer in duration than Grady's video and he doesn't mention Proctor Test either: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGuX7rmzlzA
And after reading the wikipedia article about Proctor Tests, I think Grady made the right editorial judgement to omit that topic from a 10-minute video targeted at a general audience.
Or put another way, if cf100clunk made a video about retaining walls and was constrained to 10-minutes, you would also be forced to leave out some essential topic that other geotechnical engineers would criticize. You can't please everyone when you have time constraints.
EDIT add: thanks to other's links, I noticed that Grady already mentioned Proctor test in a previous June 2020 video "Why Does Road Construction Take So Long?"
I'm going to find "zero" very hard to believe, what with this being a 10 minute general audience video. I seriously doubt I'm just three additional minutes away from being an expert on the topic ready to take on any geoengineering task I could desire.
Edit: Let me put it a different way. While I watch and enjoy his video series, I've been showing them to my 10-year-old and 13-year-old kids, and I'm pretty sure they're not that far out of the target audience.
I think you may be mistaken - note that a "25 degree slope" is just a different way to say a 2 to 1 slope (2 feet across, 1 foot up). I've seen 2:1 slopes used for highway embankments, but earth fill usually specified as a 3:1 slope (18 degrees) - eg when I worked with an earth fill dam (holding back water, same as yours). I've only seen anything steeper (1:1, 45 deg) used a as a temporary (during construction) condition.
Sheepsfoot rollers are good for packing very fine material (silt, clay) but not very good for packing larger granular material (i.e. crushed stone/gravel). Silt and clay are very water sensitive materials: each has a very specific moisture content where it can be packed properly, if your material is outside of this narrow range it will not get to maximum compaction (and therefore it will eventually settle). Water moves very slowly through clay so if it is too wet or too dry it's very difficult to get it back into the proper moisture range, and if there's a bit too much sun or some rain between excavation and placement it will not get packed well. The only reason I've seen clay-ey earth intentionally used is for inhibiting water movement, IE an earth fill dam - and even there, it was a secondary barrier if anything happened to leak through the barrier membrane.
Crushed stone is (relatively) very easy to get to maximum compaction, and if it sits out for a while and gets too dry you can just hit it with a water truck before placing. It packs quickly and easily, and is stable at the ssame side slopes as earth fill
We had some crazy operators who would do things like chaining the dozer to a trackhoe at the top of the hill so it would not roll over, to do the final grade of the slope. There's more laws now, and/or fewer fools with earth moving equipment.
No worries, when I heard 25 degrees my gut reaction was "that can't be right". Then I did the calculation and saw that the common ratios used are a lot fewer degrees than I expected :) I was thinking of grades in percentage (rise divided by run expressed as a percentage - so 50% for a 2:1 slope, 33% for a 3:1, etc)
> There's more laws now, and/or fewer fools with earth moving equipment
I think stricter rules (or enforcement thereof) has led to the proliferation of long-reach excavators.
Reinforced earth is a different beast altogether for sure.
https://www.manualihoepli.it/media/doc/pr141.pdf
What I mean by 3:2 (base divided by height) is often referred to as 2/3 (height divided by base) and is roughly the "natural" angle of repose of - say - gravel.
By comparison to their source, our hills are pleasant soft sandcastles, all rubbery clays with veins of sand or gravel and never any excuse for explosives.
Also in use are rapid impact compactors, basically a crane pounding away. Vibro compaction, where 30m long vibrating needles are driven into to soil. And best of all, Dynamic impact compaction: lift a big chunk of concrete 50m in the air and let it free fall. Then do it again and again... See https://vimeo.com/415927984 @ 3:15
Either way, you can't really get to an angle that would be considered a "wall" without mechanical reinforcements, can you?