Looks like they on the same path as academia. Which ceded to a parasitic administrative class eating all the resources with made up bullshit jobs for the overproduced elite.
I don't know much about academia, but is that really a fair assessment of the Linux foundation? Most charities are considered "good" if they spend less than 25% of revenue on admin overhead, and the article says the Linux foundation spends only 7.8%.
Unfortunately, the same is true of a lot of charities as well.