The software world is well versed in the concept of a single point of failure, and the importance of eliminating it and mitigating any chance.
And yet here we are downplaying a critical design problem because it was a single point of failure?
The software world is well versed in the concept of a single point of failure, and the importance of eliminating it and mitigating any chance.
And yet here we are downplaying a critical design problem because it was a single point of failure?
A "crazy trap-setting knifeman attack" is not the only scenario that results in a blocked exit trapping people inside the building in a life-threatening situation. Think about it for a second. Imagine, for instance, that a fire breaks out for any reason. Is this unthinkable? And how do you factor in emergency response personnel trying to go up the same stairs that are the only way out of people trapped in the building?
We should not forget past lessons for no reason.
Yes, past lessons should be remembered but it looks like there is no data that would support building double staircases in reality - it's just too rare of a problem. Same reason why almost nowhere in the world requires outside fire exits like many buildings in NYC do - they are great in idea and I'm sure there are examples of them saving lives, but it's not worth making them a requirement for every building ever made.