There have been thousands of homeopathy clinical trials. None has ever proven any effectiveness beyond placebo. So, I asked not for pharmaceutical industry level studies, but for academic level - that’s a much lower bar.
Homeopathy will never met the requirements of pharmaceutical testing, which, for other readers, is why they are sold as as supplements. They pose minimal risk as their are no active ingredients. That does not mean that they do anything. It means they do nothing or nothing harmful.
The reason that you’re resorting to ad hominem attack and twisting my statements is that you can’t demonstrate any effectiveness. You have faith in the idea of homeopathy and no amount of proof will ever dissuade you. You didn’t need fact or proof to believe it works, so no fact or proof will change your mind.
While I really don’t care what you believe, but don’t position your opinions and insubstantial faith as fact. It isn’t based on any fact.
You might also like to consider holding your fellows to the same standard as your foes. Why do you let homeopathy practitioners operate in an extreme version of what you falsely criticise conventional medicine? Why not do some reading on the opposite perspective and learn why we challenge homeopathy? Don’t be stuck in an echo chamber.
I sincerely hope that you don’t need to rely solely on homeopathy to cure a serious illness. I don’t care if you use it along side other conventional treatments because it does nothing and it is impossible for it to do so.