My Freelance taxes/social sec/retirement tax in Italy is on average 76% on a total of 80k eur average gross annual income (98th income percentile).
My Freelance taxes/social sec/retirement tax in Italy is on average 76% on a total of 80k eur average gross annual income (98th income percentile).
On your wage, you'll pay $50/month economist + $80/month health/pension + $80/month municipal taxes.
These taxes changed this year. Previous year it was 5% if you pass $50K and 15% if you surpass ~$120K.
The thing is that remote programming is considered "export" and export has no VAT. The numbers above are literally the taxes I paid in 2021 & 2020 (I paid the 5% of profit tax on 2020). I may have missed any small thing like $14/month for electronic signature & software. Mostly less than $500/year in all other things combined.
Edit: By "taxes changed this year" on parent comment, I meant in 2021. Not in 2022.
BTW, if you invoiced 65k instead of 80k, you could use the "forfettario" tax regimen, which would result in a higher net income (yes, it's that crazy: you earn more if you earn less).
VAT is typically charged to customers and then compensated with the VAT you pay if you as a freelancer have expenses.
For instance in Spain I have to increase my clients invoices by 21%, but if those invoices are for software, you have almost no purchases to offset that, so I need to pay that 21% quarterly.
So to earn 50k€ in net terms, I would need to charge 25k€ extra just on income tax, plus 3.5k€ on direct taxes on freelancing (because Spain), plus 21% VAT.
It’s no wonder the south of Europe does poorly.
So yes, if you spend all your money to the last penny, that would be your tax rate. But many (higher income) people do not.
When I measure my revenue, I always leave VAT out. It was never my money.
If you have a profit of 80k and your net income is 19k, you're doing something very wrong. This is not an accurate representation of Italian taxes and social security. A more reasonable net income for that gross is 40k; but you have to take into consideration that with around 24k of the other 40k you are paying a pension (not a very generous one, but still).
Why are we comparing a country with a city in GDP per capita terms? And is this meant to imply that standard of living is higher in Bucharest than, say, Vilnius?
I would assume two cities with similar GDP per capita (as Vilnius and Bucharest) can have wildly different standard of living depending on many other factors.
"And is this meant to imply that standard of living is higher in Bucharest than, say, Vilnius?"
Statistically, it is, albeit by a small margin. There is also Cluj Napoca (Romania's second or third largest city, similar size to Vilnius), also at a higher standard of living than both, but I don't know much about that city. Outside these two, Romania is a wasteland.
Edit: Interesting:
Vilnius is the major economic centre of Lithuania. The GDP per capita (nominal) in Vilnius county was €25,400 (~US$30,000)[285] in 2019, making it the wealthiest region in Lithuania and the second-wealthiest region in the Baltic states.
Almost one third of national taxes is paid by Bucharest's citizens and companies. In 2009, at purchasing power parity, Bucharest had a per-capita GDP of €26,100, or 111% that of the European Union average and more than twice the Romanian average.
So likely Bucharest's GDP per capita is higher by a wider margin.
Edit 2: The region Bucharest-Ilfov is the most developed region in Romania, with a GDP per capita of 139% of the European average. Bucharest thus surpasses other European capitals such as Athens, where the GDP per capita reaches 92% of the EU average, Madrid (125%), Berlin (118%), or Budapest (102%).
I was thinking of "standard of living" as something akin to "quality of life" (which is subjective of course, but here are a couple of rankings placing Vilnius above Bucharest [0][1][2][3]). Also, for someone working remotely, a lower GDP per capita (assuming good infrastructure, low inequality/poverty/crime and corruption, etc. which are true in Vilnius, at least) might be preferable.
That being said, I think the trend for most of these statistics (GDP, HDI) for Lithuania vs Romania (or Vilnius vs Bucharest) seems to favor the former as well.
e.g. Vilnius county went from 0.861 to 0.920 HDI (0.59 delta) between 2009 and 2019; Bucharest went from 0.898 to 0.933 HDI (0.35 delta) in the same time period [4]
[0] https://mobilityexchange.mercer.com/Insights/quality-of-livi...
[1] https://www.numbeo.com/quality-of-life/rankings.jsp
[2] https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2020/cities-and-happiness-a...
[3] https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/maps/qua...
[4] https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/shdi/LTU+ROU/?levels=1%2B4&in...
> but here are a couple of rankings placing Vilnius above Bucharest [0][1][2][3]
informative, thanks for this!
> HDI
dang, i didn't consider looking into HDI. not sure how it's measured but it places bucharest-ilfov on par with parts of the UK and east switzerland?
https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/shdi/ROU+CHE+GBR/?levels=1%2B...
Either way you are right, quality of life is subjective. I don't particularly enjoy life here overall, just taxes and the group of friends I have. Romania is far behind central and western europe in terms of mindset, but is nowhere near the low level i thought it was.
Once you make 1 cent more, you get hammered with 76+%.