At the end of the day Rogan's power has pissed a lot of people off, and they are desperate to find something, anything, that sticks to him. But it's so blatantly obvious that the end result is nothing but further loss of media credibility.
At the end of the day Rogan's power has pissed a lot of people off, and they are desperate to find something, anything, that sticks to him. But it's so blatantly obvious that the end result is nothing but further loss of media credibility.
Tbh the data they talked about sounded solid, they were clearly talking about real papers and data, and Malone didn’t seem like he was BSing (although I think “mass formation psychosis” is insane and neither Malone nor Rogan should be talking about stupid shit like that).
But on the vaccine, was there a lot of bad data there? If there was, where’s the takedown?
Pardon me if I detect a mass psychosis for an illness that almost assuredly will be troublesome, but overall less of a discomfort than draconian lockdown and so forth. And overall will (statistically) kill almost no one who contracts it.
Yes, cue the “but 900,000 people”, and I’ll cue the litany of unforeseen consequences that will reduce life expectancy even further.
But I’m pretty sure there is some mass psychology applied to our response to covid, and it’s generally overblown when we involve mass psychology. Just ask Charles Mackay.
Under this logic you could accuse anyone of a disparate political view (ie anarchism) of mass psychosis