This article makes a lot of pretty bold claims (not only pointing out a flaw but suggesting that there is a better alternative) without posting their own AI's image recognition results based on spike timing.

> One thing is certain; a new AI model based on spike timing will pop out of nowhere and displace the existing paradigm.

Ok this is one thing which admittedly annoys me: is this certain, as in 99.999% probability? And with what time frame? Would the author be willing to enter a bet where I wager $1 and win a billion dollars (since it has positive expected value for a "certain" event)?