Rogan has a long history of false vaccine claims on his show, presented both by him and his guests:
https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/covid-misi...
He'll surely challenge a guest when he thinks they're wrong, it's his own mistruths and the ones he ignores that are at issue here.
The Duke rape case completely blew up Rollingstones credibility pretty much forever it was that egregious.
So what you're saying is that one act of disingenuous credibility should forever taint a publisher? Say...like Joe Rogan?
And Rollingstone has multiple examples of either exaggerating stories or making them up out of whole cloth.
Ok so then maybe don't make statements like this:
> blew up credibility pretty much forever it was that egregious.
There is “misinformation”, saying something untrue, then there is straight up spreading lies you know are untrue (Duke rape case), trying to cover it up when exposed and doing it multiple times.
I think the 2nd can permanently destroy credibility.
You can see him using motivated reasoning to defend the talking point he was trying to advance -- a talking point that itself has an obvious agenda behind it.