> Companies are comprised of people and those people are almost always the ones making the ultimate decisions.
What would be an example of a company where “those people” (who comprise the company) are not making “the ultimate decisions”?
What would be an example of a company where “those people” (who comprise the company) are not making “the ultimate decisions”?
If 100 applicants are rejected for byzantine/opaque reasons without ever being reviewed by a person, I think it is not unreasonable to characterize those exclusions as decisions not being made by the people in the company. Of course, someone in the company did decide to implement and use the filter, so I wouldn't argue the point very strongly.