How many "mistakes" do they have to make before you reconsider? They lied to their users for years that their software was end to end encrypted. They sent user's data along with their keys through servers in China. They rolled out their own encryption system, lied about what algorithms they were using, and the encryption they were actually using had well known weaknesses. If they aren't outright malicious they've somehow managed to maintain a level of incompetence that's just as harmful.
In Chromium/Chrome it does but limited to 9 people.
I argue that they are definitely knowledgeable and capable of security. The nuance is they care about their own security, not the users'.
Case in point: Their MacOS installer abuses the pre-installation step to fake a System prompt to obtain root, very much like malware. Before you actually click install, it's already done [1].
In this case it was merely a shortcut to reduce the number of clicks to install, but it clearly betrays their disregard for user control & security.
[1] https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/zoom-mac-one-click-i...
* SEO Bonus: I couldn't find this article on Google no matter what I queried for. But DuckDuckGo found it on my first attempt.
Guess abusing SEO to hide negative press is among their tactics as well.
I have previously reported bugs to Google, including one where they simply didn't put any auth on an API endpoint for a new feature, allowing access to any account's data. That is a massive oversight, but at Google scale we realise these things happen, and the more important consideration is how companies respond.
Zoom have a private bug bounty program, but I previously disclosed Zoom bugs publicly [1] as I didn't think their bug bounty program was worthwhile engaging with.
However, they overhauled it, and now of the dozens of private programs I am part of, Zoom's is one of the absolute best. The payouts are great, the team actively engages with the researchers, and seem to legitimately care about getting things right.
Are they perfect? Of course not. But I would feel safer on a Zoom call that call with many competitors who simply don't get as much scrutiny.
[1] https://www.tomanthony.co.uk/blog/zoom-security-exploit-crac...