> Also source code is pointless without dev(s)
Given the number of people still interested in Winamp, I'm sure there would be people willing to work on it if it were open-sourced.
I meant no offense :-)
Given the number of people still interested in Winamp, I'm sure there would be people willing to work on it if it were open-sourced.
I meant no offense :-)
So as long as I end up with WACUP being a program that fulfils my needs in allowing my plug-ins to keep working & happens to be of use to others wanting a supported native 'classic' winamp experience (due to the pivot from a plug-in pack to being a standalone player) then I'm going to keep doing it irrespective of what is / isn't happening with "winamp" (I don't view anything that now comes out as being winamp other than a brand name slapped onto some code).
-dro