Hacker News Reader

But then you're processing the whole list, probably defeating the point of breaking.

that's a performance optimization. you have other performance optimizations available often, with tradeoffs.

FP is a higher level paradigm so you might have to trade off with performance too

>FP is a higher level paradigm so you might have to trade off with performance too

Then it can hardly he said be to unequivocally be better, can it.

that's like saying high level languages cannot be unequivocally better then writing assembly, not doing your own memory management is bad, etc...

Functional programming is a higher level abstraction. If the underlying implementation is not well implemented/optimized then you could have bad performance while the opposite is also true.

>that's like saying high level languages cannot be unequivocally better then writing assembly,

Yes, it is like saying that. At least, assuming by "cannot be" you mean "is not".

>not doing your own memory management is bad

No, it's not like saying that. Note how differently those claims are phrased.

i don't understand what you mean. Are you referring to performance or implementation details?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com