Throwing up one's hands and saying "welp, demographics/statistics/climate change/demon fairies are at play, here, so I guess we'll do nothing" is certainly capitalist, but it's not very good.
That is actually imbalance you are seeking.
For example if 90% of people in a domain are of race X, then unbiased selection *should* select 90% of race X. Assuming the perceived investment opportunity is evenly distributed between all people.
I agree there. If you grow up in a chaotic country where survival is your main concern, it is less likely you will be involved with creating new technology.
> Eschewing them because "statistics" or "demographics" is, as i said, lazy.
Having fair and unbiased selection on your pool of applicants is not "Eschewing" anyone. I'd say that claim is lazy.