Or, if you don't like it, don't watch the channel or leave a dislike or comment why the claim is wrong.
This isn't even a call to violence or targeted harassment. It's the opinion of a man about election results.
This isn't even a call to violence or targeted harassment. It's the opinion of a man about election results.
So you agree YouTube is perfectly ok to remove content because it mentions 'the opinion of a man about election results.'?
And if Trump was to hypothetically win in 2024, would it be perfectly fine for YouTube to remove any content which is dissenting of Trump? I'm sure a dislike or negative comment would stop that...
There is nothing stopping Trump from creating his own video platform. He is supposedly a billionaire isn’t he?
It's true the large social platforms are privately owned and so they can censor to their hearts content, but given the obliquity and integration these largest platforms have in the social fabric, is that reasonable?
Should they at least have clear moderation policies? It's an issue that needs some hefty discussion and evaluation especially, as we're seeing in this thread, the outsized influence on and control of public discourse they have.