And if there are people who want to by the oven, why not deign to let them?
At best, we should require that there be clear labeling and I would be surprised if there aren't regulations that cover that.
And if there are people who want to by the oven, why not deign to let them?
At best, we should require that there be clear labeling and I would be surprised if there aren't regulations that cover that.
Some people will say that there are still budget models (Sceptre is a common brand that comes up in these discussions) that doesn't have any of that, but they're not selling these products out of goodwill - they just have a lot of dead stock (panels, etc) that they can shift profitably. This stock will run out (and it does - do these TVs have any modern features such as HDR, a quality panel, etc?) if it turns out to be more profitable to produce spy devices that happen to display TV content rather than produce devices intended to display TV content with no interest (nor capability) to spy.
The proper solution is to heavily restrict advertising and data collection so that in the end the advertising-based business model isn't profitable and it becomes more profitable to just go back to the old model of selling good, purposeful devices at a profit.
I don't understand this. Couldn't they leave an empty space?