Our companies sets up production in China to take advantage of loose labour laws and abuse workers, but cry foul when they get hit by loose IP laws.
Also the US stole textile technology from the British Empire to launch it's own industrial revolution.
Also your regular reminder that intellectuall properly is legal fiction that some cultures do not recognise, or see differently.
See how stupid that argument sounds?
Then go out on the street and ask 'do you think it's morally wrong that India does not respect our medical patents so that they can produce cheap generic treatments from cancer accesible to their people'
You will find that the number of people that believe these two situations are morally comparable is roughly ~0%
Your argument sounds even more stupid. You are comparing something commonly recognized as a crime to some artificial concept forced down the throat of a country that was being exploited and was frankly in their right to use whatever means to get out of that subservient state. The west is patented everything by now. Expecting the rest of the world to serve that system and be poor forever is disgusting.
You compared "intellectual property" to slavery. Try again.
That said, this man isn't a spy - the fact that the government couldn't rig a jury in Tennessee makes very clear that he is innocent.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON#Examples_of_industrial...
[1] https://apnews.com/article/b40414d22f2248428ce11ff36b88dc53