Can you really call it a public service if its not accessible to the public? Maybe a "Americas/Europe"-only service, but then it would sound questionable...
The Seattle Public Library is a public service despite not allowing residents of Guangzhou to borrow books.
In any case, physical goods and services are not analogous to digital goods and services. Or are you redoing the the piracy-is-stealing argument??
If you want a special definition of "public service" that means "accessible every human on earth without any exclusions" then that's fine, but telling someone something isn't a public service because you want to use a special definition of the phrase that no one else seems to use is a bit... overly argumentative?