Language syntax is always a highly personal matter, subject a coder's preferences. That being said, I'm not very fond of the latest changes that have been implemented in the Python language. The "walrus operator" being the latest example.

As always, there is very good reasoning behind this PEP. And ultimately, when growing a language and becoming more "professional", complexity is added to the language or syntax.

From a personal point of view, I can get behind the following syntax change

  value = my_object?.value 

instead of doing

  if my_object:
    value = my_object.value
  else:
    value = None

or even

  value = my_object.value if my_object else None

But looking into other examples given in the PEP, things can get quite messy and "ugly".

  mangle_from_ = policy?.mangle_from_ ?? True

I love Python and will continue to use it, both personally and professionally. I just hope the Python developers try to draw a line somewhere. Sometimes a design is good enough and further evolution / development should not be done, because every change can be justified in some way or another.