There's also all the academic literature of Weyl et al. that makes the basis of the book, but I've found that to be less accessible [1].
references:
- 1: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pandp.20181002
references:
- 1: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pandp.20181002
The use of QV in voting scenarios where you have 100 tokens to split among alternatives seems completely motiveless, beyond “QV is great because there’s a mathematical proof.” But a proof of what? Not a proof of anything relating to that voting scheme, as far as I can see.