I generally agree - the facts are rights, but their application do not address my question. The educational achievement doesn't translate to high paying careers. So women are graduating from college at a higher rate, and getting advanced degrees at a higher rate. But what makes a difference (for pay) is what subjects those degrees are in and what jobs they get after graduation.
For example, I know a woman who has two masters degrees but doesn't really work. She is about 35 and has spent most of her life in school, focusing psychology. Even if she had focused more on working in the field of psychology than just serially earning degrees, she would still be at the lower end of pay due to those jobs paying less than STEM jobs.
This anecdotal experience seems to be backed up by the BLS study that also acknowledges that more women are graduating college but that choice of career/subject has not seen that translate into higher pay. That's why I was wondering what is driving the inverse scenario in those cities. Is it that women are choosing STEM there? Are policies in place that promote women from not working low paying jobs (ie makes it more attractive to be a homemaker instead of pay for childcare while working hospitality etc). Or is it cultural, like lower birth rates or more male caretakers?