Isn't it the case that the global temperatures are stubbornly refusing to match the (increasingly bonkers) rhetoric? Perhaps that's the reason for warmists digging their heels in even further, censoring dissent etc.
Correct, they are in fact worse than most calculations, in terms of absolute values and acceleration. It turns out that we are not being pessimistic and scared enough.
Obama is a climate denier?
if sea levels rise by two feet he'll lose a bit of land around the edges, but it's hardly "at sea level"
This guy has been digging up old NASA publications showing what they claimed, in 2000, that the temperature was between 1950-2000 and what they claim today that the temperature was between 1950-2000.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/spectacularly-poor-clima...
What a surprise. Waiting for the inevitable ad hominem attack on the source vs. a discussions of the facts he presents.