The principal thing here however is, Putin thinking he can rule other countries and nations is the core issue here.
The principal thing here however is, Putin thinking he can rule other countries and nations is the core issue here.
Since Sweden hasn't ever been part of NATO nor felt the need to, why now all of a sudden when that was part of what triggered the conflict putting an entire country into ruins.
Anyway, the question was whether Ukraine tried diplomacy. Answer is, yes they did and it did not worked.
The context you are missing is outlined quite clearly in Timofei Sergeitsev's RIA Novosti article, What Russia should do in Ukraine.
I still don't wanna join NATO, that's a reason for Putin to take Gotland from us.
You appear to be trying to take a reasoned position after taking the Kremlin's arguments at face value, which is a pretty big mistake.
Here's the CliffsNotes version for you: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/into-the-heart-of-darkness-what-russi...
> this one article
…Are you aware that this one article was published by RIA Novosti, which means it's the Kremlin's official position?
I mean this is not even true? It is not like this one article was the only source or place where this is claimed.
Ah yeah, the crazy logic of every abusive ex. “Don’t you dare looking at anyone else or else I snap your neck” Very persuasive.
Ukraine was nowhere close to be even considered for EU or NATO membership. So what exactly “triggered” the conflict? Other than the fact that Putin decided to send in troops to grab larger and larger pieces of Ukraine?