Once again, you miss my point, that you yourself have subscribed to this line of argument, where you argue one must accept the greater application of a principle if they accept the lesser application, when you made your snide remark that the original commenter must also reject seatbelt laws. You're also completely ignoring my claim that I've repeatedly witnessed many other anti-libertarians doing the same in relation to COVID restrictions.
Anti-libertarianism is a cause, movement and ideology, and it enables any level of rights violation, subject to the conditions that society finds itself in, because as an ideology, it rationalizes away the principle that we do not have a right to violate human rights. Libertarianism is the absence of this ideology that attempts to rationalize undermining human rights, leaving only the principle that it is morally inexcusable to violate human rights.