They didn't say science should progress regardless of consequences, they didn't imply it, and the way you ask it sounds like you want to start an argument. Instead, what they said was that likely some legitimate scientific endeavours were discouraged by people quoting the movie when their concern wasn't warranted.
I say this as somebody who spend 30 years learning how to permanently modify human genomes only to conclude we're not even remotely ready to have the ethics conversations those things would lead to.
I’m saddened that a jurrasic park comparison shuts down all debate without considering the merits or risks.
Humans seem highly vulnerable, especially when in groups, to thought-terminating cliches like this.
I wonder how you fight against it?