Not sure why, but the article doesn't have the original photos that went along with the post(s):
https://web.archive.org/web/20160919103031/http://blogs.scie...
https://web.archive.org/web/20150926005801/https://blogs.sci...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160919103031/http://blogs.scie...
https://web.archive.org/web/20150926005801/https://blogs.sci...