HAhaha I'm 30, but damn that shows my lack of knowledge in tech! Oops!
It's just my broad perception of 1.0 vs 2.0 from the things I've read.
Embarrassing.
It's just my broad perception of 1.0 vs 2.0 from the things I've read.
Embarrassing.
So while it’s technically true that Web 1.0 was in some limited sense interactive, I agree with your comment that 2.0 was where interactivity as we think of it really began, especially regarding forms. Also worth noting that if you look at how others define Web 2.0, a common theme is the focus on user-submitted content, which is consistent with your impression of what 2.0 was.
(And to be clear, I’m hardly a teenager; I’m 40, remember 1.0 and 2.0 very well, and have spent more than half my life building both kinds of sites professionally.)