I tried to write a more thorough comment but also struggled with being coherent. Thus, some ideas, only briefly:
- At an even higher level, the web itself and the overlapping userbases/communities ('intersectionality', without the discrimination--the original set-theory kind?) of individual sites can also be considered a way of organizing content
- Thus, analogously: Search engines replaced directories and webrings as algorithms did tags. The present SEO meta, though...
- Generalizing from Commons, all Wikimedia wikis (Wikipedia, etc.) have parallel category structures, only less developed due to the greater reliance on links. So do most wikis in general, though Wikimedia also unifies categorization and structured data with Wikidata. From there are knowledge graphs and databases in general, wrapping back around to Google trying to determine the Knowledge Graph item that each query refers to.
[0] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories
[1] all the typical keying on depicted people, things, times, and places, plus the ways that we categorize those. Niches from 'horizontal bicolor blue and white flags' to 'Luxembourgish pronunciation by gender', 'trams on route 709', 'ships with 6 funnels'. There's a tool (now called vCat) to visualize categories, some outputs here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikimedia_catgra...
[2] https://archiveofourown.org/faq/tags
Edit: specific examples