Is it purely cosmetic? It's quoted as Tesla's claim but it's not clear whether this is disputed. "Cracks" in the underbody (I first assumed paint when I saw the title) sounded much more serious.

Edit: translated the article and this being cosmetic is actually the core of the dispute. Since it won't pass the first safety inspection, it seems obviously false and the product is not usable as one could reasonably have expect and thus Tesla will have to fix it or refund the car under European consumer law as I know it (not sure if there are exceptions for vehicles).