I've noticed that there seems to be something in the progressive mindset -- and here I'm speaking generally, not about you -- that says, in effect, "if we can describe a reasonable causal chain that led to a behavior, then we can excuse that behavior." I don't think this follows. A description of the hardships that led to violent behavior, say, is not universally exculpatory (neither morally, in my own view, or as a matter of law).
It’s a neat trick, but it begs the question. There’s no evidence that you see complexities I don’t, as nice as that would be for your ego. I assure you, I’ve thought about it. We simply disagree.
~2,000,000 in US vs ~1,700,000 in China.
Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/262961/countries-with-th...
Freedom of speech is a privilege without teeth.