Solend realised this, and took a vote on seizing this amount (effectively removing the tokens from the owner's ownership and preventing them from exiting their position) requiring only 1% of token holders to approve. The vote passed. Now they've backtracked.
Wouldn't it be in Solana's interest to continue being used as collateral? Why would anybody continue accepting Solana-based collaterals if funds can be seized at will?
The creditors might get back less money than they lent to the whale if the whale defaults and the creditors have to sell Solana. So doing nothing is not great for them, either.
> Solend realised this, and took a vote on seizing this amount (effectively removing the tokens from the owner's ownership and preventing them from exiting their position) requiring only 1% of token holders to approve. The vote passed.
* big fucking asterisk