especially here on HN, where a few years ago it was all blockchain this, blockchain that, and you could have intelligent conversation about cryptocurrency without someone immediately clawing at your throat. and now we have bi-hourly 5-minute hate instead
totally organic, yes?
When the price goes up, people are happy and write happy articles. When the price goes down, people are sad and write sad articles. How that actually happens is that, the people writing the happy and sad articles are different groups of people who each wait for the price to do what they need it to justify their position.
The price is down, so it justifies negative positions. When the price is up in ~3 years, there will be more people writing happy articles. When that happens I won't think they've all been paid to (even though it is obviously more likely that the group selling something has financial interest in promoting it).
https://www.google.com/search?q=bitcoin+blockchain+child+por...
You're the one complaining about the last few months of increased negative articles. If you cannot see the connection between the frequency of negative articles and the price of Bitcoin, then I'm sorry but I don't know how to communicate in braille.
and besides, the OP blog post has nothing to do with the prices either.
There have traditionally been more of these on the pro-crypto side, because not many people devote time to talking about it unless they're getting paid, and there's not much money in being anti-crypto. There are some people (like me) who do it anyway, though, and TV bookers/publications have become better at finding us.
For some reason he totally missed the whole cryptocurrency thing, which a lot of cryptographers did in the early days. The problem is that he still is regurgitating the same FUD from 8+ years now.
These days I look to up to folks like Dan Boneh. That guy is amazing.
stronger arguments that no one cares to argue against will languish on the backpages